Reflection and Imagination

A Ricoeur Reader: Reflection and Imagination Edited by Mario J. Vald4s UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO PRESS Toronto and Buffalo

Views 90 Downloads 2 File size 7MB

Report DMCA / Copyright

DOWNLOAD FILE

Recommend stories

Citation preview

A Ricoeur Reader: Reflection and Imagination

Edited by Mario J. Vald4s

UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO PRESS Toronto and Buffalo

Ricoeur Reader Ploo.' 1958)'p 233 ude llvi-S tra uss, / nthtopologie structulal? (Paris: , claire J acobson aoo by rans' n!.lish translatioD: Srru curu! AnLhropology, s"loepf (Harmoodsworth: Peoguir Books' 1968)' t

.Xf."

C."af"t,

.210-111 rd, p.23a [211] .d, p.239 I2161 rd, p.

Word, PolysemY, MetaPhor: Creativity in Language

2,ll [217]

id,p.2a8l2ul \d,

p.U3l2nl

et

'oi"i

ii[.,it, 's"t I'exdgese de Gendse 1' 1-2' 4a" iq Rolaod Bartbes " Extgise et herm,neanque lParis: Seuil' 1971)'pp'6'7-e' , (New York: Odyssey iirtoti.,fn" lrt o1 eoerv, trans by Philip wheelwright ess, 1951), P. 115

l;lirf iiir, r*,r a'une phitosophie iicoeur's translation]

du stvle (Paris:

A

colin'1e68)'p

11s

we This paper is about the creative aspects of language' However helpful sugges-A .""'^"Lio platitudes about this formidable topic' -ii#-i#ffi;".-uv u" touno' I think' in ihe fddous aphorism-or f;muoroi*ttiitt describes language as an infinitg-qpe ' Looking foi a striking illustr-ation of-this ccihtrait' I' ot-nnli" .,ianrd:it:in ioi"e receni interpretations of metaplor which depart nqt iior ttt. traditional interpretition ot rhetoric Anq:tgit to-be an-ornament of larguage or a stylistic decoration'{t{lla semanrlc n-.. o f m e an i n g' I n o rde r. to"ift ?oduce-t h i s :' an -'n .i'n"**" "..ig" might be fruittuIto present it asan alternative " ";;;bi',rr,i;lf,,1tririt oppos.ed.!9 o,theJ ,d;;;idft"urse, disinct from and ard :lllecies' scientific language' titore of ordinary Ianguage

wifii;;"t ."-t.

"u.ti.i'iutf" "*Th;;;i";;iiit.ei., te..

t"o tn-e

to

b5gsgp!g$uR4#S

n"gulgei which we call_PolYsgmYt reirarkable feature ot woros ln

contained in this n

and to connect it to the focus

about the strategy of language. Hence the strategy of this of all First, we shall sPeak of the s,.nitn"t as the actual bearer potenthe in t-euage' Then we shall consider polysemy as the "i.utluitu iia .i.^ii"itii'";,iineo in the word. Third, wd shall co-nsider and of aiternate strategies opened by polysemy' and finally' as the metaphor describe *e shali ot ri,il pap.t. r'u"irt. considered discourse or ;i tt . tr-'iri tino or stratesv of poetic discourse' My goal will be to show that paper, that in thii

,-n. iilrt*

;il;;;a;;.

"t

o/

Word, PolJsemy, Metaphol 6,6 A fucoeur Reader

best this slrategy preserves -11:

ot The Sentence as tt':-ll-"-Ut"

lotentil

of creativity of the words

nilllt I'I:1*

' r -^

the same coin two sides o[ one and the like