• Author / Uploaded
• msamael

Citation preview

CAPACITY VERIFICATION 1

Part Number

4 Run@Rate

2

Part Description

5 Supplier

Name

3

TRW Annual Capacity Planning Volume

6 Supplier

Location

Process Step Process Description Units hours shifts days weeks hours

7

II - Supplier Capacity Data

I - Supplier Working Standards

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

III - RUN at RATE Results

22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

pcs/year

Working hours/shift Shifts/ day Days/ week Weeks/ year Total hours/year (9*10*11*12)

% of line for TRW parts (Allocation %) - See Example Quoted Production Rate (part # item 1) Quoted % scrap Quoted % line efficiency Adjusted production rate (15*(1-16)*17) Available capacity (15*14*(1-16)*17)*13 Utilization % (3/19) Bottleneck operation

% pcs/hour % % pcs/hour pcs/year % X

Trial run duration Total parts produced Number of bad parts First time capability % ((23-24)/23)*100 Number of good parts (23-24) Net output (26/22) Takt Time Rate (Target) (3/13*14) Downtime

hour pcs pcs % pcs pcs/ hour pcs/ hour hour

Reason

text

Run-Off utilization % (3/(27*13*14)) Bottleneck operation

% X

STEP 1

STEP 2

Date

STEP 3

STEP 4

STEP 5

STEP 6

30 31 32

0.0% X

0.0% X

0.0% X 34 SUMMARY

SHADED CELLS ARE CALCULATED and protected

The RUN@RATE results are acceptable and meet TRW capacity planning volume requirements: The attached capability study results meet TRW requirements:

33

36

Corrective actions are required:

Date:

New production readiness trial run is required:

Date:

Supplier representative signature:

Date: 03 Sep 2005 Rev: D Doc No: D_020_4_12 Page 1 of 7

Overall Process Utilization % 0.00%

0.0% X

0.0% X 35

Status Acceptable

Auditor Information Name: Company: Location:

Auditor signature:

53123415.xls; Run at Rate Form

Process Owner / Department: K. Gillis / Supplier Development Approved By: E. Carpenter / VP Purchasing

0.0% X

CAPACITY VERIFICATION 1

Part Number

30301458B

4 Run@Rate

2

Part Description

Inflator retainer bracket

5 Supplier

Name

3

TRW Annual Capacity Planning Volume

pcs/year

6 Supplier

Location

STEP 1 Process Step Stamp Part Process Description Units This is the actual time spent producing hours product and should 7.5 shifts exclude such things as 3 meals, days breaks, 5 preventative weeks maintainance etc. 48 hours 5400

7

II - Supplier Capacity Data

I - Supplier Working Standards

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

III - RUN@RATE Results

22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

700,000

Working hours/shift Shifts/ day Days/ week Weeks/ year Total hours/year (9*10*11*12)

STEP 2 CNC #1

Date

February 14, 2004 Acme Machining Cleveland, OH

STEP 3 CNC #2

STEP 4 Weld Fasteners

STEP 5 Paint

STEP 6

8.5 2 5 48 4080

7.0 3 5 48 5040

7.0 3 5 48 5040

10.5 1 5 48 2520

% of line for TRW parts (Allocation %) - See Example Quoted Production Rate (part # item 1) Quoted % scrap Quoted % line efficiency Adjusted production rate (15*(1-16)*17) Available capacity (15*14*(1-16)*17)*13 Utilization % (3/19) Bottleneck operation

% pcs/hour % % pcs/hour pcs/year % X

100% 720.0 2% 97% 684 3,695,933 19%

87% 210.0 2% 94% 193 686,677 102% X

100% 164.0 5% 95% 148 745,970 94%

100% 240.0 9% 92% 201 1,012,677 69%

50% 1200.0 5% 95% 1,083 1,364,580 51%

Trial run duration Total parts produced Number of bad parts First time capability % ((23-24)/23)*100 Number of good parts (23-24) Net output (26/22) Takt Time Rate (Target) (3/13*14) Downtime

hour pcs pcs % pcs pcs/ hour pcs/ hour hour

2.00 929 5 99.46% 924 462 130

1.00 249 2 99.20% 247 247 197 0.5

2.00 290 4 98.62% 286 143 139

1.25 252 12 95.24% 240 192 139

1.00 794 4 99.50% 790 790 556

Reason

text

Run-Off utilization % (3/(27*13*14)) Bottleneck operation

% X

72.3%

70.3%

Reprogramming

30 31 32

28.1%

79.8%

SHADED CELLS ARE CALCULATED and protected

34

The RUN@RATE results are acceptable and meet TRW capacity planning volume requirements: YES 33

36

Date: 03 Sep 2005 Rev: D Doc No: D_020_4_12 Page 2 of 7

The attached capability study results meet TRW requirements: NO Corrective actions are required: NO

Date:

April 1, 2404

New production readiness trial run is required: NO

Date:

May 16, 2004

Supplier representative signature:

Tom Alison

53123415.xls; Run at Rate Form Example

97.1% X SUMMARY

35

Overall Process Utilization %

Status

97.13%

Acceptable with Caution

Auditor signature:

Auditor Information Name: Gerald Biggs Company: TRW Location: Mesa, AZ

Gerald Biggs

Process Owner / Department: K. Gillis / Supplier Development Approved by: E. Carpenter / VP Purchasing

0.0%

RUN AT RATE ACTION PLAN ITEM

STANDARD CHECKLIST ITEMS

1

ARE ALL TOOLING GAGES AND FIXTURES IN PLACE?

2

IS A MANUFACTURING FLOOR PLAN DEVELOPED?

3

ARE ALL PACKAGING REQUIREMENTS MET?

4

IS PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE IN PLACE?

5

IS MISTAKE PROOFING ACCEPTABLE?

6

ARE BOTH THE SUPPLIER AND RUN-OFF UTILIZATIONS